100KS Fund Broker Review

In the world of online trading, presentation often hides the reality. 100KS Fund promotes itself as a forward-thinking global broker offering tight spreads, a wide selection of assets, VIP treatment, and modern trading tools. On its website and in promotional content, the company suggests long-term success, awards, and thousands of satisfied traders. But when we investigate beyond the marketing, a very different picture emerges.

This review takes a closer look at the true face of 100KS Fund. We examine its corporate structure, regulation, trading conditions, withdrawal practices, and reputation among real clients. The findings indicate that this is not a safe broker, but rather a high-risk offshore scheme that should be approached with extreme caution.

Corporate Structure and Identity

One of the first warning signs is how 100KS Fund presents its corporate background.

• Offshore registration: The company claims to operate as 100KS Fund Ltd, registered as an International Business Company (IBC) in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. At the same time, its legal documentation refers to Mwali/Comoros and even mentions entities such as Podora Limited in the Marshall Islands. This patchwork of jurisdictions is typical of firms trying to avoid real oversight.
  
• Licensing confusion: The broker states it “operates under the license of 1Market Ltd.”, but there is no valid connection between 100KS Fund and any regulated entity. The reference appears to be a borrowed name to add credibility.
  
• No public leadership: Nowhere does the company reveal who owns or runs it. There are no executives, no directors, no compliance officer, no verifiable team members.
  
• No physical presence: There is no confirmed office location. The only contact channel provided is [email protected], which raises serious doubts about accountability.
  

The company also insists it has been in operation since 2017. However, a domain check shows the first site connected to 100KS appeared only in July 2023, and its main domain 100ksfund.com was registered in April 2025. In other words, its supposed history is fabricated to look more established than reality allows.

Key takeaway: 100KS Fund is a shell company without transparency, credibility, or an identifiable responsible party.

Regulation and Oversight

The absence of proper regulation is perhaps the most damaging issue.

• Not regulated in the EU, UK, US, or Australia. There is no license with CySEC (Cyprus), FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), SEC (US), or any major regulator. Searches of official registries confirm this.
  
• Offshore paperwork only. The company references “authorization” by the Mwali International Services Authority (Comoros). But this is not a financial regulator in the conventional sense; it is an offshore registrar known for selling licenses cheaply without oversight.
  
• No client protections. Because it lacks regulation in trusted jurisdictions, 100KS clients do not benefit from:
  
  • Segregated accounts
    
  • Compensation schemes
    
  • Mandatory audits
    
  • Best-execution obligations
    
  • Legal ombudsman escalation
    

To make matters worse, independent financial sites in Russia and the CIS already list 100KS in blacklists of suspicious brokers. This means experts have publicly flagged it as unsafe.

In short: The company is unregulated where it matters. Any certificates it shows are cosmetic, not real safeguards.

Reputation and Client Feedback

The online reputation of 100KS Fund is overwhelmingly negative. Across forums, review sites, and financial blogs, the same stories repeat themselves:

• Deposits are easy, withdrawals impossible. Traders describe being able to fund accounts without issue, but every attempt to withdraw triggers extra demands or account blocks.
  
• Invented charges. Common stories include being asked to pay:
  
  • “Verification deposits” (e.g., €1,600 just to confirm identity)
    
  • “Prepaid taxes” before receiving profits
    
  • “International wire fees” that must be covered in advance
    These fees are never mentioned when depositing.
    
• Manipulated platform behavior. Users claim trades closed suddenly, stops were skipped, and charts behaved unnaturally—indicating the broker controls the outcomes.
  
• Aggressive communication. Initial calls and chats from “personal managers” are friendly and persuasive. Once deposits are made, the tone changes. Clients report pressure to add more funds and even threats when they resist.
  
• Fake positive reviews. A few glowing comments appear online, but they repeat identical phrases and lack detail—suggesting they are manufactured.
  

One trader summed it up: “They let you deposit, but they will never let you withdraw.”

The pattern is too consistent to ignore: this is not a handful of isolated complaints, but a systematic model of abuse.

Trading Conditions and Platform

On the surface, 100KS promotes appealing features. But details are scarce, and where available, the reality doesn’t match the marketing.

Promises include:

• Thousands of instruments (stocks, crypto, indices, metals)
  
• Zero stock spreads
  
• Copy trading
  
• VIP accounts
  
• 24/7 service
  
• Fast withdrawals
  

What’s missing or unclear:

• No published spreads or commission schedules
  
• No transparent account types or minimum deposits
  
• No information about liquidity providers or execution quality
  
• No disclosure on swap rates, margin calls, or stop-out levels
  

Leverage: The broker advertises margin trading, but does not publish ratios. Offshore firms typically push high leverage (1:100 or higher) to entice clients while increasing their risk of loss.

Platform: Instead of offering MetaTrader 4/5 or another trusted system, 100KS uses a proprietary web-trader. This closed platform:

• Provides no independent trade logs
  
• Can easily be manipulated by the broker
  
• Has been reported to freeze, disconnect, or close trades at suspicious times
  

Conclusion here: The trading environment is non-transparent and fully controlled by the broker, not by real market forces.

Deposits, Withdrawals, and Payment Practices

How money moves is where 100KS’s true nature is most obvious.

• Accepted methods: credit/debit cards, bank transfers, ApplePay, GooglePay, and especially cryptocurrency. The strong push for crypto funding is a red flag—these transfers are irreversible and anonymous.
  
• Withdrawals: This is the point of failure. Clients consistently report:
  
  • Long delays
    
  • Requests for additional payments
    
  • Blocked accounts after refusing to pay extra fees
    
• No published withdrawal policy: Reputable brokers provide exact timelines (e.g., 1–5 business days). 100KS provides none.
  

In practice, deposits flow in easily, withdrawals almost never flow out.

Marketing and Client Acquisition

100KS’s client-gathering strategy is also concerning.

• Referral schemes: Users are encouraged to bring in friends or contacts in exchange for rewards. Details of these rewards are not publicly transparent.
  
• Cold outreach: Many victims describe being contacted on social media by people posing as “successful investors” who recommend 100KS as the key to easy profits.
  
• Advertorials: Articles on blogs and platforms like VC.ru appear to promote 100KS, written as if they are reviews. But these pieces read like disguised marketing campaigns.
  

This focus on constant new deposits instead of long-term clients mirrors the structure of Ponzi-style operations. When old clients stop paying, new ones must be brought in.

Red Flags to Highlight

Let’s summarize the most alarming issues traders should notice:

1. Unregulated status – no oversight by major financial authorities.
   
2. Anonymous company structure – no leadership, no offices, no accountability.
   
3. Contradictory history – claims to operate since 2017 but domains date from 2023–2025.
   
4. Fake platform – closed web terminal, not connected to real markets.
   
5. Withdrawal blockages – multiple reports of demands for extra payments.
   
6. Aggressive marketing – cold outreach, fake reviews, and referral pressure.
   
7. Offshore jurisdictions – chosen for secrecy, not safety.
   

Each one of these would be a red flag on its own. Together, they form an undeniable picture of a high-risk scam operation.

Conclusion on 100KS Fund

100KS Fund is not what it claims to be. The company presents itself as a professional broker with years of experience, but the reality shows an offshore setup, a short online history, a closed trading platform, and a consistent pattern of client losses and blocked withdrawals.

No regulation, no accountability, and no transparency mean no real safety for traders. Every piece of evidence—from domain registrations to client testimonials—points to the same conclusion: 100KS Fund is a fraudulent scheme disguised as a brokerage.

Our verdict: Stay away. If you value your funds, avoid depositing with 100KS Fund. Choose a regulated broker with proven oversight, published conditions, and a verifiable track record.

Defazz Broker Review

Defazz advertises itself as a modern and trustworthy brokerage platform, promising simple access to forex, stocks, CFDs, and cryptocurrencies. The website highlights “innovative technology,” personal account managers, and attractive conditions such as a low entry threshold and leverage up to 1:100. At first glance, it may look like an opportunity for both beginners and experienced traders.

However, deeper investigation tells a different story. The project has been flagged by regulators, its licensing claims do not hold up, and client complaints reveal a consistent pattern of blocked withdrawals, hidden fees, and manipulative practices. This review examines all available details about Defazz to show why it should be treated with extreme caution.

About Defazz

• Websites: The broker operates through defaazz.com and deefazz.com. A client subdomain web.defaazz.com has also been referenced by users.
  
• Claimed founding date: Defazz presents itself as active since 2020. In reality, the main domain was registered only in mid-2025, contradicting its own story.
  
• Address: The site lists a London office at 175 Piccadilly, St. James’s, London W1J 9TB. No evidence confirms that Defazz actually operates from this location—it is a serviced office address used by many unrelated firms.
  
• Contacts: Only an email address ([email protected]) is provided. No verified phone numbers or social media channels are available, which is unusual for a broker aiming at international clients.
  

This minimal and inconsistent corporate footprint is already a red flag.

Regulation and Legal Status

Defazz claims to hold licences from CySEC and the UK FCA, even referencing licence numbers on some promotional pages. Checks with the official registers show no such authorisations exist.

• CySEC: No listing for Defazz or any company behind it.
  
• FCA: No entry in the Financial Services Register.
  
• Bank of Russia: On January 30, 2025, Defazz (with domains defaazz.com and deefazz.com) was officially added to the regulator’s warning list for signs of illegal financial activity.
  

In addition, there is evidence suggesting offshore registration, likely in St. Vincent and the Grenadines—a jurisdiction notorious for hosting unregulated brokers.

In short: Defazz operates entirely without oversight. Any claims about licences are fabricated.

Trading Conditions

According to its marketing, Defazz offers:

• Several account types, though details are vague
  
• Trading in forex pairs, stocks, cryptocurrencies, and CFDs
  
• Leverage up to 1:100
  
• Minimum deposit from $250
  
• Bonus programs, “fund insurance,” and personal managers
  

But in practice, user reports and watchdog reviews point to very different conditions:

• Lack of transparency: No clear spreads, commissions, or swap fees are published. Numbers differ across pages.
  
• Hidden withdrawal fees: Clients report being asked to pay 15–40% of their balance upfront as “taxes” or “insurance” before they can withdraw. Payments never result in successful withdrawals.
  
• Platform manipulation: Executions delayed up to 72 hours, price feeds that don’t match market data, and stop-loss orders ignored. This suggests clients are not connected to real markets at all.
  
• Account freezes: When a client tries to withdraw or stops depositing, their account is often blocked or their balance reset to zero under vague excuses like “technical errors” or “compliance issues.”
  

What appears on the surface as attractive terms is, in practice, a system designed to prevent clients from ever reclaiming their deposits.

Client Experiences

Dozens of complaints across forums and review sites describe almost identical scenarios:

• Initial friendliness and promises from “personal managers.”
  
• Encouragement to deposit more funds after seeing early “profits” on the platform.
  
• Refusal to process withdrawals unless extra fees are paid.
  
• Accounts blocked or profits wiped out after withdrawal requests.
  
• Threats and intimidation when victims attempted to escalate legally.
  

Such consistency across unrelated victims strongly indicates systemic fraudulent practices rather than isolated incidents.

Affiliations and Red Flags

Defazz does not appear to be a standalone operation. Investigators link it to other suspicious brokers such as SmartTradingCenter and Auros-ai, which use the same design, promises, and tactics. Crypto deposit tracing shows funds from different brands moving to the same wallets, reinforcing the theory of a shared network.

Main warning signs include:

• Fake regulatory numbers and no official licences
  
• Offshore or unverifiable registration
  
• Anonymous owners and hidden WHOIS data
  
• Prestigious UK address with no real presence
  
• Multiple mirror domains used to bypass blocks
  
• Aggressive marketing with unrealistic promises
  
• Withdrawal blackmail and fabricated fees
  

Together, these factors confirm that Defazz fits the typical profile of a short-lived scam broker.

Security of Funds and Transparency

One of the most important aspects when choosing a broker is how client funds are protected. In the case of Defazz, there are no clear statements about segregation of funds, partnerships with tier-1 banks, or participation in investor compensation schemes. Legitimate brokers normally highlight these protections as part of their compliance standards. Here, nothing of that kind is provided.

Additionally, the website avoids publishing ownership information, audit results, or financial statements. The absence of such data makes it impossible for clients to verify whether their deposits are handled securely or simply pooled into the operator’s own accounts. This lack of transparency increases the risk of misappropriation.

Marketing Tactics and Target Audience

Reports and user testimonies suggest that Defazz relies heavily on aggressive marketing strategies: cold calls, unsolicited emails, and advertisements on social media that promise “guaranteed” high returns. Such tactics are designed to attract inexperienced investors, often with claims of quick profits, insured deposits, and professional guidance from “analysts.”

Another common technique is the use of early “demo profits” or artificially inflated balances. New clients see their accounts grow rapidly, which encourages them to deposit more money. Once larger sums are invested, withdrawal problems begin. This psychological manipulation is a hallmark of boiler-room operations targeting retail traders in CIS and EU regions.

Conclusion on Defazz

Defazz is not a trustworthy brokerage. Its claims of regulation are false, its operations are hidden behind offshore and anonymous structures, and its reputation is built on deception. User reports consistently highlight blocked withdrawals, manipulated platforms, and financial losses.

The broker has already been placed on the Bank of Russia’s warning list, and all available evidence suggests it is part of a wider fraudulent network.

Defazz should be avoided at all costs. Depositing money with this platform carries an almost certain risk of losing it entirely. If you have already invested, stop transferring funds, collect evidence of your transactions, and seek assistance from your bank or financial authorities.

Raliplen Broker Review

Raliplen is a recently launched online trading brand that has quickly drawn scrutiny from investors and regulators alike. The firm promotes a broad CFD menu, a “MetaTrader” web terminal, round-the-clock support and multi-tier VIP perks—yet discloses no legal entity, holds no recognized license, and has already been named in multiple regulatory warnings. This review consolidates everything we know so far: web footprint and claimed profile, regulatory status, trading offer and platform, user experiences, site quality signals, likely network links, and concrete next steps for anyone who has already deposited.

What Raliplen Says It Is vs. What We Can Verify

Claimed public profile

• Brand / sites: Raliplen operating via raliplen.com and raliplen.net.
  
  • raliplen.com registered 10 February 2025.
    
  • raliplen.net appeared late July 2025.
    
• Audience & language: English-language marketing aimed at a global retail audience, including CIS countries.
  
• Address (claimed): 54 Fenchurch Street, London EC3M 3JY, UK.
  
• Contacts (claimed): +44 2039617102, +44 2038622925, [email protected].
  
• Social media: No active, verified channels identified.
  

What’s missing / inconsistent

• No legal entity name (no incorporated company, number, or jurisdiction disclosed).
  
• No license numbers, membership in a compensation scheme, or named regulator.
  
• The London address looks like a generic office-block locator frequently used by shell outfits; no independent evidence of genuine on-site operations.
  

Domain History & Digital Footprint

• Both domains are brand-new (H1–H2 2025).
  
• Early traffic and discoverability were near zero, which clashes with the site’s rhetoric about global presence and experience.
  
• The appearance of a second domain (.net) shortly after the first (.com) is a frequent tactic in boiler-room ecosystems to reset a tainted reputation while maintaining the sales script and tooling.
  

Regulation, Licensing & Official Warnings

Licensing: None. Raliplen does not appear in the registers of FCA (UK), CySEC (CY), ASIC (AU), NFA/CFTC (US) or other reputable authorities.

Public warnings already issued

• ASC (Alberta, Canada): Investment Caution List – 11 June 2025.
  
• BCSC (British Columbia, Canada): Not registered to trade in securities/derivatives – 9 July 2025.
  
• AMF (Québec, Canada): Not authorized to solicit in the province (2025).
  
• FSMA (Belgium): Listed among illegal online platforms in a July 24, 2025 roundup.
  
• FCAA (Saskatchewan, Canada): 2025 notice grouping Raliplen with similarly structured unregistered schemes.
  
• FCA (UK): No authorization; consumers warned not to treat it as a UK-regulated platform.
  

Implications

• No statutory client-fund protection.
  
• No recognized dispute resolution avenue.
  
• Cross-border pursuit of claims becomes significantly harder.
  

The Trading Offer (Marketing vs. Reality)

What’s advertised

• Minimum deposit: $250 (a familiar entry point used by high-pressure sales teams).
  
• Leverage: Up to 1:500 (well above legal caps for retail in regulated markets—e.g., 1:30 EU/UK).
  
• Instruments: A sweeping CFD catalog (crypto, stocks, indices, commodities, metals) with NFTs also mentioned. No credible liquidity providers named.
  
• Accounts / VIP tiers: Multi-level statuses with promises of tighter costs, bonuses, and “premium” support; no transparent, static fee schedule.
  
• Extras: “Personal manager,” “signals,” “copy-trading,” “daily analysis,” and educational content.
  

Platform reality

• “MetaTrader” access is provided via a web terminal hosted on a third-party domain: webtrader.aternlyx.tech.
  
• This is a white-label environment widely observed across scam clusters: the operator can control pricing, execution, and even simulate P&L internally, with no external market routing.
  

Deposits & withdrawals (what users report)

• Funding: Cards, bank transfers, crypto, sometimes Apple/Google Pay intermediaries.
  
• Withdrawals:
  
  • Early small test payouts may succeed to build trust.
    
  • Larger withdrawals trigger blocks, delays, or fabricated charges (15–50% “tax,” “insurance,” “liquidity release fee,” etc.).
    
  • Paying these charges rarely unlocks funds.
    

Patterns in User Complaints

1. Account freezes upon withdrawal requests (or new KYC demands appearing only at cash-out time).
   
2. High-pressure “analysts” / “personal managers” urging ever-larger deposits, promising safety or “guaranteed” returns (a regulatory red line).
   
3. Invented fees and moving goalposts: sudden “verification upgrades,” “security deposits,” new rules quietly imposed after profits.
   
4. Aggressive solicitation: cold calls, spam emails, social ads, and leads from job/finance sites; scripted office-noise backdrops and emotional hooks (dreams, needs, urgency).
   

A minority of glowing reviews praise low spreads and friendly support, but they read like templated astroturf: vague, overly positive, lacking trade specifics—and they sit starkly at odds with the broad negative pattern.

Website & Content Quality Signals

• Legal opacity: no operator name, no corporate docs with binding terms, no regulator IDs, no audited statements, no partner/liquidity disclosure.
  
• Generic marketing copy: boilerplate claims (instant quotes, 24/7 support, VIP discounts, daily analysis) that mirror language seen across known boiler-rooms.
  
• Questionable assertions: broad claims about “global licensing” without any numbering or verifiable references.
  
• Multilingual traces: advertorial-style posts in Russian/CIS channels, at times awkwardly phrased and mixed with promotions of third-party “fund recovery” services—another hallmark of low-credibility campaigns.
  
• Technical veneer: SSL and a modern façade don’t compensate for the absence of verifiable legal and operational substance.

Likely Links to a Wider Boiler-Room Network

• Shared infrastructure: the aternlyx.tech webtrader host appears across a set of similarly constructed “brokers,” suggesting a common back-end and operator.
  
• UK virtual presence: +44 20… numbers and generic City of London addresses recur in complaints tied to other brands.
  
• Regulator groupings: authorities often list Raliplen alongside look-alike websites launched in the same window with near-identical offers and user-complaint trajectories.
  
• Brand recycling: the quick pivot from .com to .net is consistent with rinse-and-repeat labeling once negative coverage accumulates.
  

Risk Assessment 

• Counterparty risk: With no license and no entity disclosed, clients have no way to validate segregation of funds, order routing, or even the existence of a real market behind the UI.
  
• Operational risk: The operator can unilaterally alter prices, execution, balances, or terms; users have no enforceable recourse.
  
• Legal risk: Cross-border recovery is difficult; crypto rails are irreversible; chargeback windows are time-sensitive.
  
• Regulatory risk: Multiple warnings already exist; continued operations may end abruptly, taking the site—and access to accounts—with them.
  

Conclusion on Raliplen

Raliplen exhibits the full profile of a non-legitimate, high-risk brokerage operation: no license, no legal entity transparency, brand-new domains, a white-label webtrader on a third-party host, aggressive sales, fabricated withdrawal fees, and multiple official regulatory warnings in 2025. The marketing veneer cannot substitute for regulated status, verifiable corporate identity, and a defensible client-protection framework.

Do not open or fund an account with Raliplen. If you are researching the brand for investment, treat it as avoid at all costs. If you have already deposited, act quickly using the steps above to maximize your chances of recovery and to reduce exposure to further harm.

Brevis Technology Broker Review

Brevis Technology (brevistechnology.co) presents itself as a modern, international broker that offers access to global markets. On the surface, the company advertises cutting-edge trading tools, multiple account options, and educational resources for traders. However, a closer investigation exposes an entirely different picture: an unlicensed operation, hidden ownership, and a long list of red flags that position Brevis Technology among high-risk and potentially fraudulent brokers.

This review takes a deep look at the company’s background, platform, trading conditions, client experiences, and overall credibility.

Registration and Regulation

One of the first warning signs is the lack of transparency regarding Brevis Technology’s legal background.

• The domain brevistechnology.co was only registered in June 2025, despite the broker claiming to have been operating since 2014.
  
• In an attempt to appear legitimate, the company lists a Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) that belongs to an unrelated Swedish consulting firm, Brevis Premere Capital AB. This entity has no proven connection to the broker.
  
• Checks with major regulators (FCA, CySEC, etc.) show no licenses for Brevis Technology.
  
• On August 28, 2025, the Bank of Russia blacklisted the broker, explicitly marking it as an illegal financial service provider.
  

In short, Brevis Technology is completely unregulated, operates under false pretenses, and hides behind private domain registration services.

Ownership and Transparency

The company provides no real information about its management or owners. There are no names of executives, no registered headquarters, and no verifiable corporate history. The use of a Swedish firm’s LEI without authorization demonstrates a deliberate attempt to mislead traders.

Anonymous ownership is always a red flag in online trading. In this case, it strongly suggests that Brevis Technology is an offshore operation designed to collect deposits without accountability.

Trading Platform and Tools

Brevis Technology markets a “powerful trading platform” with fast execution and modern features. Some materials even reference MetaTrader; however, there is no actual evidence that MT4 or MT5 is available. Instead, users are directed to a basic web-based platform that resembles WebTrader.

Available instruments are advertised as:

• Cryptocurrencies
  
• Forex pairs
  
• Stocks
  
• Commodities and precious metals
  
• CFDs on indices
  

While this sounds impressive, clients have no proof that trades are executed on real markets. In fact, everything suggests the platform is a closed system where prices and results are controlled by the broker.

Account Options

Brevis Technology divides its services into six account tiers, each requiring progressively larger deposits:

• Bronze (from $300) – entry-level, includes basic trading education.
  
• Silver (from $600) – adds weekly analysis and broker-provided trading signals.
  
• Gold (from $1,000) – offers a 5% cashback, a 10% welcome bonus, and a basic course.
  
• Platinum (from $5,000) – promises higher bonuses, more cashback, and a personal manager.
  
• Diamond (from $50,000) – marketed with advanced training, direct analyst contact, and supposedly “no withdrawal fees.”
  
• VIP (from $200,000) – top-level account, advertised with personalized service and a 25% welcome bonus.
  

This tiered system clearly aims to push traders into depositing more money. The bonus offers are especially problematic: they come with hidden conditions requiring unrealistic trading volumes before any withdrawals are approved.

Deposits and Withdrawals

Funding is heavily tilted toward cryptocurrency payments (BTC, ETH). Although credit cards and bank transfers are sometimes mentioned, many clients report being pressured to use crypto.

Withdrawals are where problems become obvious:

• The broker requires a minimum balance of $50,000 before withdrawals are possible.
  
• Clients report being asked to pay additional “taxes,” “insurance fees,” or “AML verification charges” before withdrawal requests are considered.
  
• Even after paying, traders rarely receive their money.
  

This structure makes it virtually impossible for anyone to successfully withdraw funds.

Reputation and Client Reviews

Brevis Technology’s reputation among traders is overwhelmingly negative. Consistent complaints include:

• Blocked accounts once withdrawal requests are made.
  
• Invented fees that must be paid before funds can be released.
  
• Aggressive cold-calling from sales teams, promising guaranteed profits.
  
• Fake “managers” trading on behalf of clients and quickly losing deposits.
  
• Ghosting of clients after they refuse to send more money.
  

Real user stories illustrate the pattern:

• One trader from Poland reported that after seeing “profits” on his account, he was suddenly asked to pay multiple fees for withdrawal. Once he refused, all communication stopped.
  
• Another client described how his “analyst” managed his account over WhatsApp, showing supposed gains, but no funds were ever returned.
  
• Russian-speaking traders bluntly state that “you can deposit as much as you want, but you’ll never be able to withdraw.”
  

Positive reviews online are scarce and often suspected to be fabricated.

Scam Indicators

Brevis Technology demonstrates every major sign of a fraudulent broker:

1. No regulation or oversight – confirmed by its inclusion in the Russian central bank’s blacklist.
   
2. Anonymity – no public ownership details, fake corporate references.
   
3. Crypto-only payments – irreversible transactions that protect the scam operators.
   
4. Unrealistic withdrawal rules – $50,000 minimum balance, bonus traps.
   
5. High-pressure sales tactics – constant phone calls, manipulative promises.
   
6. Referral schemes – encouraging clients to bring in new victims.
   

The combination of these tactics leaves no doubt: Brevis Technology is not a genuine broker.

Domain and Website Details

• The site was registered in June 2025 through Porkbun (U.S.).
  
• All ownership data is hidden behind privacy services.
  
• Hosting is provided via Cloudflare, adding another layer of anonymity.
  
• The site itself is built on a simple WordPress template with generic marketing content.
  

The technical setup strongly indicates a short-lived operation. Scam brokers often run for a few months before disappearing and relaunching under a new name.

Conclusion on Brevis Technology

Brevis Technology is not a legitimate broker. It is an unregulated, anonymous, and deceptive operation built to extract deposits from unsuspecting traders.

Key points to remember:

• The company has no licenses and is already blacklisted in Russia.
  
• All withdrawal structures are designed to block clients from accessing funds.
  
• Reviews consistently describe fraud, manipulation, and theft.
  
• Technical and corporate details confirm this is a recently launched, short-term scam project.
  

Brevis Technology is a scam broker. Traders should avoid it completely. Anyone contacted by its representatives should treat it as a serious warning sign and protect their finances accordingly.

RossKitWay Broker Review 

RossKitWay (rosskitway.com) presents itself as a trusted international brokerage platform, claiming to provide access to global financial markets, a wide range of trading instruments, and “exclusive investment strategies” with returns of up to 200% annually.

However, a thorough investigation reveals a very different picture: offshore registration, fabricated licenses, aggressive marketing, and clear signs of a fraudulent operation resembling a high-yield investment program (HYIP) or pyramid scheme.

Company Background and Legal Status

RossKitWay is officially registered in the offshore jurisdiction of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines — a territory notorious for minimal regulatory oversight and a long history of hosting unlicensed brokers.

The broker’s website lists license numbers allegedly issued by top-tier regulators such as the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), and even the Central Bank of Russia (CBR). Verification with the official registries of these regulators confirms that no such licenses exist, and RossKitWay is not authorized to offer brokerage services in any of these jurisdictions.

In short, RossKitWay operates without any legal license, meaning clients have zero regulatory protection and face a high risk of losing their funds.

Trading Platform

RossKitWay claims to offer a “state-of-the-art trading platform” designed for both beginners and experienced traders. According to its website, the platform supports fast trade execution, advanced charting tools, and real-time market data. However, there are no detailed technical specifications, no mention of compatibility with recognized industry standards like MetaTrader 4 (MT4) or MetaTrader 5 (MT5), and no downloadable software provided.

Most likely, the so-called trading platform is a proprietary web-based interface that only simulates trading activity without actually routing orders to real financial markets. This assumption is supported by multiple victim reports stating that trades were “profitable” on-screen, yet no actual execution took place on genuine exchanges or liquidity providers.

Trading Instruments

RossKitWay advertises access to a broad selection of financial products:

• Forex pairs — Major, minor, and exotic currency pairs
  
• CFDs on stocks — Shares of global companies
  
• Indices — Popular market indices like S&P 500 and NASDAQ
  
• Commodities — Precious metals, energy products, and agricultural goods
  
• Cryptocurrencies — Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other altcoins
  

While this list might appear diverse, no transparent information is provided regarding spreads, commissions, margin requirements, or leverage levels. Moreover, without regulatory oversight or verified market access, it is unclear whether any of these instruments are actually tradable on real markets.

Account Types and Conditions

RossKitWay promotes multiple account tiers, often pitched during sales calls:

• Basic — Minimum deposit from $250–$500, limited access to features
  
• Silver/Gold — Larger deposit requirements (up to several thousand USD), with “priority support” and “advanced tools”
  
• VIP — Minimum deposit often exceeding $10,000, promising “exclusive strategies” and the highest returns
  

These account descriptions are vague and vary depending on the salesperson. There is no transparent comparison table, no fixed fees or commission structure, and no legal documentation outlining precise conditions for each tier.

Educational Resources

The broker claims to offer educational materials such as trading tutorials, webinars, and market analysis. However, most of this “education” appears to be marketing-oriented, designed to encourage higher deposits rather than to genuinely improve trading skills. Several victims reported that “training sessions” consisted mainly of sales pitches for upgrading to more expensive account types.

Marketing Tactics and Unrealistic Promises

RossKitWay relies on aggressive marketing strategies to attract new clients:

• Cold calls promising high and stable profits
  
• Spam emails promoting “guaranteed earnings” and “exclusive trading plans”
  
• Social media ads featuring stock images of “successful traders” and fabricated success stories
  

The platform openly advertises returns of up to 200% annually — sometimes even more during direct calls with potential investors. No legitimate, regulated broker can make such guarantees, and promising fixed high returns is a major red flag for investment fraud.

How the Scam Works

RossKitWay follows a well-known fraudulent blueprint:

1. Initial Deposit — Clients are persuaded to deposit an initial sum (usually $250–$1,000) with promises of quick profits.
   
2. Illusion of Profit — In the user’s dashboard, account balances appear to grow steadily, creating the illusion of successful trading.
   
3. Withdrawal Barriers — When a client attempts to withdraw funds, they are asked to pay “taxes,” “commissions,” or “verification fees” — costs not mentioned in the initial agreement.
   
4. Account Block — If the client refuses to pay, their account is blocked, and all communication with the broker stops.
   

Victim Testimonies

Numerous victims have shared similar experiences:

• Moscow, Russia: One client deposited ₽750,000, only to be told he needed to pay an additional ₽150,000 for “transaction verification” before withdrawing. Refusal resulted in immediate account termination.
  
• Yekaterinburg, Russia: Another investor lost $15,600 after being shown “profitable trades” in the account, which turned out to be fake. Withdrawal requests were ignored before the account was closed.
  
• Novosibirsk, Russia: A trader deposited ₽400,000 but later learned that none of the trades were executed on real markets. Withdrawal attempts were met with silence from customer support.
  

Notably, genuine positive reviews for RossKitWay are virtually nonexistent — the few that can be found appear generic and likely fabricated.

Key Red Flags

RossKitWay exhibits nearly every warning sign of a scam broker:

• No regulatory license in any jurisdiction
  
• Unrealistic return promises (200% annually)
  
• Anonymous ownership and hidden contact details
  
• Aggressive marketing and psychological pressure
  
• “Deposit more” scheme before any withdrawal is processed
  

Regulatory Warnings

On August 1, 2025, the Central Bank of Russia (CBR) officially placed RossKitWay on its blacklist of companies exhibiting signs of operating a financial pyramid scheme. This is not a minor administrative note — the CBR uses this classification when an entity shows multiple hallmarks of a fraudulent investment operation, such as:

• Offering guaranteed high returns without clear risk disclosure
  
• Using funds from new investors to pay existing participants (Ponzi structure)
  
• Operating without the required licenses for brokerage or investment activities
  
• Concealing ownership and operational details
  

Being listed by the CBR means that RossKitWay is prohibited from legally providing any investment or brokerage services in Russia. The warning serves as a public alert that the broker operates illegally, and that any money sent to this platform is effectively placed outside of legal protection frameworks.

It’s worth noting that other major financial regulators — such as the UK’s FCA and Cyprus’s CySEC — also have no record of RossKitWay in their license registers, confirming the broker’s completely unregulated status on an international scale.

Website and Domain Analysis

An inspection of the domain rosskitway.com reveals several inconsistencies with the broker’s public claims:

• Domain Registration Date: WHOIS records show that the domain was registered only a few months before the company began actively promoting itself, yet the broker claims to have “many years of trading experience.”
  
• Ownership Privacy: The WHOIS information is completely hidden using third-party anonymity services, a common tactic among fraudulent operators to shield their identities from law enforcement and investigative journalists.
  
• Technical Infrastructure: The website is hosted on inexpensive shared servers rather than secure, enterprise-grade hosting. This is atypical for genuine brokers, who usually invest in high-level security infrastructure to protect client data.
  
• Content Reuse: A reverse image search of website visuals shows that many of the promotional images are stock photos available for free or at low cost, indicating no proprietary branding effort.
  

Together, these points strongly suggest that RossKitWay is a recently created, disposable brand designed to operate for a limited period before disappearing or rebranding.

Links to Other Fraudulent Projects

Several indicators suggest RossKitWay is not a standalone operation, but rather part of a wider network of scam brokers:

• Identical Website Templates: The layout, color scheme, and structure of RossKitWay’s website are nearly identical to those of other known scam brokers previously exposed in online fraud reports. This includes the arrangement of menus, phrasing of marketing slogans, and even identical typos in legal documentation.
  
• Shared Legal Texts: Portions of RossKitWay’s “Terms and Conditions” and “Privacy Policy” match word-for-word with those found on other scam broker websites, which have already been blacklisted by regulators.
  
• Reused Contact Emails: The contact email format used by RossKitWay matches patterns seen in related scam projects — often a generic admin@domain email, with no actual corporate contact details.
  
• Same Offshore Incorporation Pattern: Many of these connected brokers also claim to be registered in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, often without any verifiable company number or corporate filings.
  

This pattern of clone sites and serial rebranding is typical of organized fraud networks: once a broker gains too many complaints or regulatory warnings, it shuts down, registers a new domain, and starts the cycle again under a new name.

Conclusion on RossKitWay 

RossKitWay is an unlicensed offshore broker operating under false pretenses, using aggressive sales tactics and unrealistic promises to lure in unsuspecting investors. The company’s inclusion in the Central Bank of Russia’s blacklist confirms the fraudulent nature of its operations.

RossKitWay should be avoided at all costs. Any funds deposited are at high risk of being lost permanently. Investors are strongly advised to work only with licensed brokers regulated by reputable authorities such as the FCA, CySEC, ASIC, or the CFTC.

ElazarCapital Broker Review

ElazarCapital (elazarcapital.com) presents itself as a reputable international broker with years of experience, premium trading conditions, and advanced analytical tools. On its website, the company promises “high standards of service” and “exclusive strategies” capable of generating substantial profits for clients. However, a closer look at the broker’s operations reveals multiple red flags — including a lack of proper licensing, opaque terms, aggressive marketing tactics, and numerous customer complaints about blocked accounts and withheld funds. In this review, we break down the facts behind the ElazarCapital brand and explain why it represents a serious risk to investors.

Company Overview

• Name: ElazarCapital
  
• Website: elazarcapital.com
  
• Claimed Jurisdiction: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines (offshore zone)
  
• Stated Licenses: unspecified “international regulatory approvals” – unverified
  
• Trading Instruments: Forex pairs, CFDs on stocks and commodities, cryptocurrencies
  
• Operating Model: web-based trading platform and mobile application
  

Domain registration checks show that elazarcapital.com was created relatively recently, contradicting claims of a long operational history. The company’s legal address places it in an offshore jurisdiction with minimal financial oversight.

Trading Platform

ElazarCapital offers access to trading exclusively through its proprietary web-based platform and a mobile application. Unlike widely recognized platforms such as MetaTrader 4/5 or cTrader, this in-house system does not provide transparency regarding order execution, liquidity providers, or pricing sources.
Key drawbacks reported by users include:

• No option to connect to independent charting tools or third-party plugins.
  
• Limited order types and lack of advanced risk management features.
  
• Price feeds that appear inconsistent with real market data.
  
• No public audit or third-party certification of trade execution quality.
  

Such limitations make it impossible to verify whether trades are executed on real markets or simply simulated within the broker’s internal system — a common practice among unregulated entities.

Regulation and Licensing

One of the most critical factors in assessing a broker’s credibility is its regulatory status. Verification of ElazarCapital across respected financial authorities returned the following results:

• Bank of Russia: No license; listed in the regulator’s warning list as an entity with signs of a financial pyramid.
  
• FCA (UK): Not registered.
  
• CySEC (Cyprus): Not registered.
  
• ASIC (Australia): Not registered.
  

The only “regulation” ElazarCapital appears to rely on comes from offshore bodies that do not enforce investor protection or provide legal recourse in disputes. This means that clients have no effective way to recover funds through regulatory channels if the broker refuses withdrawals.

Terms and Conditions – Hidden Risks

A review of the broker’s User Agreement reveals clauses that heavily favor the company and can be used to block or delay withdrawals:

• The right to unilaterally change trading conditions without client consent.
  
• The ability to freeze accounts without explanation under the pretext of verification.
  
• Early account closure fees of up to 20% if funds are withdrawn before one year of account activity.
  
• Vague and undefined withdrawal commissions, reported by clients to reach 25–30% of the requested amount.
  

Such terms are typical of scam brokers — they create a legal pretext to withhold client funds at any time.

Available Trading Instruments

According to its website, ElazarCapital claims to offer a wide range of assets, including:

• Forex pairs: majors, minors, and selected exotic currencies.
  
• CFDs on stocks: mostly popular US and European companies.
  
• Indices: key global benchmarks such as S&P 500, NASDAQ, and DAX.
  
• Commodities: gold, silver, oil, and other raw materials.
  
• Cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and several altcoins.
  

However, without regulatory oversight, there is no guarantee that these instruments are actually traded on live markets. In many scam operations, such offerings exist only on paper to attract a broader audience.

Account Types and Minimum Deposit

ElazarCapital’s account structure is designed to push clients toward higher deposits by linking features to investment tiers. Typical account categories include:

• Basic Account – Minimum deposit around $250; limited features, basic spreads.
  
• Silver / Gold Accounts – Higher deposits (from $1,000 to $10,000); promises of tighter spreads, faster withdrawals, and personal account managers.
  
• VIP / Premium Accounts – Deposits exceeding $25,000; “exclusive strategies” and priority service.
  

This tiered system is often used by high-risk brokers to incentivize clients to deposit more without offering any verifiable improvements in service quality.

Spreads, Fees, and Commissions

The broker does not provide transparent information about its fee structure. Spreads are described as “competitive” but without specific averages for each asset class. Clients have reported:

• Sudden widening of spreads during normal market hours.
  
• Additional commissions applied at withdrawal that were not mentioned at the time of deposit.
  
• Early account closure penalties (up to 20% of the account balance).
  

This lack of transparency makes it difficult for traders to calculate the actual cost of trading.

Education and Research Tools

ElazarCapital advertises access to market analysis and educational content, but these materials are primarily generic articles and outdated charts. Unlike legitimate brokers, there is no evidence of in-depth market research, real-time news feeds, or professional-grade learning modules. Most “education” is used as a sales funnel to encourage larger deposits rather than genuinely improve trading skills.

Deposits and Withdrawals

• Funding methods: reportedly include credit/debit cards, bank transfers, and select e-wallets.
  
• Withdrawal process: officially “processed within 3–5 business days,” but clients report delays of weeks or complete non-payment.
  
• Additional “tax” or “verification” fees are often introduced at the withdrawal stage.
  
• No segregated client accounts, meaning deposited funds are likely mixed with company operating capital — another high-risk indicator.

Marketing Tactics

ElazarCapital relies on aggressive and manipulative marketing techniques:

• Cold calls from “financial analysts” promising guaranteed returns.
  
• Social media ads featuring “success stories” and fabricated trading results.
  
• Claims of “exclusive investment strategies” and “200% annual profits.”
  

Legitimate brokers do not promise guaranteed profits — especially at such unrealistic levels — as all trading involves risk.

How the Scam Works

Reports from former clients and the broker’s operational patterns suggest a classic fraudulent scheme:

1. Initial Recruitment – Potential clients are contacted via ads or phone calls and persuaded to open an account with a small deposit.
   
2. Simulated Profits – The trading dashboard shows early gains to build trust.
   
3. Pressure to Deposit More – Clients are encouraged to invest larger amounts for “premium” opportunities.
   
4. Withdrawal Barriers – When attempting to withdraw funds, clients face demands for upfront taxes, commissions, or repeat verification.
   
5. Account Freeze & Disappearance – Accounts are blocked, support stops responding, and in some cases the website goes offline.
   

Customer Complaints

Numerous victims have shared similar experiences:

• Dmitry, Moscow: “I invested 750,000 RUB. Tried to withdraw 100,000 — they demanded 25,000 RUB in commission. After I refused, my account was blocked and support vanished.”
  
• Anna, Yekaterinburg: “Transferred 500,000 RUB on their advisor’s recommendation. Two weeks later, the ‘system failed’ and my balance disappeared. They offered to return it for 10% of the loss.”
  
• Igor, Krasnodar: “Requested a $40,000 withdrawal, then got accused of violating the rules. Account blocked; site shut down a month later.”
  
• Olga, Novosibirsk: “After a mobile app update, withdrawals stopped working. Support demanded a fee to restore access — when I refused, my funds were gone.”
  

The consistency of these stories indicates a systematic approach to defrauding clients rather than isolated errors.

Connections to Other Fraudulent Projects

Technical checks suggest ElazarCapital may be linked to other scam brokers:

• Shared hosting infrastructure and IP addresses with previously blacklisted platforms.
  
• Identical website templates and client portal designs.
  
• Nearly identical legal documents with only the company name changed.
  

This pattern is common in scam networks that rebrand under new names after facing regulatory warnings.

Why ElazarCapital is a High-Risk Broker

• No valid license from a recognized regulator.
  
• Offshore registration with no investor protection.
  
• Legal clauses allowing unilateral account freezes and fund retention.
  
• Aggressive, deceptive marketing strategies.
  
• Documented history of client losses and blocked withdrawals.
  
• Official warnings from regulators, including the Bank of Russia.
  

Conclusion on ElazarCapital 

ElazarCapital shows all the hallmarks of a fraudulent brokerage operation. It operates without credible regulation, uses manipulative terms and marketing tactics, and has a clear track record of withholding client funds.

Our advice is clear:
Avoid any financial dealings with ElazarCapital. If you are already a client:

• Stop depositing funds immediately.
  
• Save all correspondence, account records, and payment proofs.
  
• Contact your bank to request a chargeback.
  
• File a report with relevant financial authorities.
  

A trustworthy broker will always have a transparent regulatory license, clear terms, and no promises of guaranteed profits. ElazarCapital fails on all these points, making it a serious danger to investors.

TekTicks Broker Review

TekTicks (websites: tekticks.com and webtrader.tekticks.com) presents itself as a reputable international broker, claiming regulation by well-known financial authorities and offering “cutting-edge trading technologies” along with “guaranteed profits.” However, a closer look reveals that TekTicks is an unlicensed offshore operation, following the classic playbook of fraudulent brokers.

Regulation and Licensing: Fictional Credentials

What TekTicks claims:
The broker advertises regulation by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC), listing license numbers on its website.

What the verification shows:

• Licenses do not exist. Official registry searches with FCA and CySEC returned no results for the stated numbers.
  
• Offshore registration. TekTicks is registered in the Marshall Islands under company number 98765 — a jurisdiction notorious for zero oversight and no investor protection.
  
• Newly registered domains. Despite claims of “over 10 years of experience,” the TekTicks domain was created recently, which is common for “short-lived” scam projects.
  

Verdict: TekTicks has no legal authorization to provide brokerage services in any regulated jurisdiction.

Client Agreement — One-Sided and Abusive

An analysis of the TekTicks Terms & Conditions reveals multiple clauses that are heavily skewed in the company’s favor:

• Unilateral rule changes. TekTicks reserves the right to alter trading conditions at any time without client consent.
  
• Excessive withdrawal fees. Up to 30% commission on withdrawals — far above any industry norm.
  
• Ban on legal action. Clients are prohibited from filing lawsuits against the company, effectively removing any legal recourse.
  

Such conditions are unheard of with legitimate brokers and are a red flag for fraudulent intent.

How the TekTicks Scam Works

Based on multiple victim reports, the scam follows a predictable pattern:

1. Fake profitability. The trading platform shows profitable trades to build client trust, but order execution is delayed and price quotes differ from the real market.
   
2. Withdrawal barriers. When clients try to withdraw funds, TekTicks demands “verification” and payments for supposed taxes, insurance, or administrative fees.
   
3. Account blocking. Even after paying the requested fees, accounts are blocked, access to the platform is cut off, and the websites may go offline.
   

Real Victim Stories

• Konstantin R., Moscow: Invested 800,000 RUB; when requesting a 300,000 RUB withdrawal, TekTicks demanded a 75,000 RUB “tax.” After refusing, his account was blocked and the platform stopped working.
  
• Anna V., Yekaterinburg: Transferred 1.2 million RUB following advice from a TekTicks “analyst.” After losses, she was told to deposit an additional 250,000 RUB as an “insurance fee” to restore her balance. Funds were never returned.
  
• Mikhail K., Krasnodar: Deposited 400,000 RUB; the funds never appeared on his account. For two months, TekTicks sent him fake transaction screenshots.
  

These cases confirm that TekTicks’ main goal is not to facilitate trading but to extract as much money as possible from clients.

How TekTicks Attracts New Victims

Aggressive advertising campaigns.
TekTicks invests heavily in online marketing, using banner ads, social media promotions, and investment-themed websites to lure inexperienced traders. These ads often feature staged “success stories” with luxury cars, exotic holidays, and claims of huge profits made in days.

Cold calling & unsolicited emails.
Many victims first heard about TekTicks through unsolicited phone calls or emails from supposed “account managers.” These individuals often use high-pressure tactics, emphasizing urgency (“This opportunity is available only today!”) to push people into making an initial deposit.

Psychological manipulation.
TekTicks’ representatives are skilled at emotional persuasion — they play on greed (“Don’t miss your chance to earn like the pros”) and fear of missing out. Once a client invests, they’re constantly encouraged to deposit more, with promises of “exclusive trades” or “special account upgrades.”

Why It’s Difficult to Hold TekTicks Accountable

• Offshore incorporation. The Marshall Islands is known for its lack of cooperation with foreign financial investigations, making it extremely difficult to trace assets or pursue legal action.
  
• Anonymity of ownership. All domain and corporate ownership details are hidden through privacy services.
  
• Disposable brand model. Even if TekTicks is exposed publicly, the operators can simply shut down the website, open a new one under a different name, and continue the scam.
  
• No physical presence. Addresses listed on the website are either virtual offices or completely fabricated.
  

Website Activity and Affiliations

• Recent domain registration. Both tekticks.com and webtrader.tekticks.com are newly created — a hallmark of short-term fraud schemes.
  
• Anonymous hosting. The domain ownership is hidden behind privacy protection services, concealing the real operators.
  
• Similarity to other scams. The website design and trading platform closely resemble those of other offshore brokers previously exposed as scams, suggesting TekTicks could be part of a larger network of fraudulent brands.
  

Reputation and Warnings

At the time of writing, no official warnings from regulators (FCA, CySEC, ASIC, etc.) have been issued against TekTicks. However, the broker already appears in “blacklists” on trading forums and scam-exposure websites. Traders describe TekTicks as a “bucket shop” — a firm that doesn’t execute trades on the real market but simulates trading to drain client accounts.

Common Client Complaints

1. Inability to withdraw funds.
   
2. Demands for additional payments before withdrawals.
   
3. Fake payment confirmations and transaction screenshots.
   
4. Aggressive calls from “analysts” pressuring clients to deposit more.
   
5. Manipulated price quotes and artificial trade delays.
   
6. Complete loss of contact once deposits stop.

Identifying Similar Scams

Knowing the warning signs can help investors avoid becoming victims of TekTicks-style fraud:

1. Promises of guaranteed profits — in legitimate trading, no returns are guaranteed.
   
2. Registration in obscure offshore jurisdictions despite claims of international regulation.
   
3. High-pressure sales tactics urging immediate deposits.
   
4. Lack of transparency about company owners, years in business, or audited financial records.
   
5. Unusual withdrawal fees and contract clauses that ban legal action.
   

Conclusion on TekTicks 

TekTicks exhibits all the hallmarks of a serial scam operation — unlicensed, offshore, anonymous, and structured to avoid accountability. Its business model is not about facilitating trading but about systematically extracting as much money as possible from clients before disappearing.

Investors should consider TekTicks a complete fraud. The safest course of action is to avoid any engagement with this company and remain vigilant for similar setups operating under different names.

Key red flags:

• No valid licenses.
  
• Offshore registration in a non-regulated jurisdiction.
  
• Fictitious regulation claims.
  
• Unfair and abusive contract terms.
  
• Identical patterns to known investment scams.
  
• Numerous victim reports.
  

Recommendation: Do not open an account with TekTicks, transfer funds, or provide personal documents. If you have already invested, stop all contact, document all communications, and seek professional legal assistance for fund recovery.

Pixocero Broker Review

Pixocero (websites pixocero.pro and pixocero.online) presents itself as a modern, international brokerage offering access to global financial markets. The company claims to hold licenses, employ a team of experienced analysts, and provide cutting-edge trading tools.

However, a closer inspection reveals a very different reality: no valid licenses, offshore registration, fake staff profiles, and a trading platform designed to manipulate prices. All evidence points to Pixocero being a classic scam broker, using deceptive marketing and fabricated results to lure investors, only to block withdrawals and drain client accounts.

The Image Pixocero Sells

On its website, Pixocero promotes an image of a regulated, trustworthy, and profitable brokerage. Their key selling points include:

• A CySEC license number that does not exist in the official regulator’s database.
  
• “Professional analysts” with decades of experience (in reality, their photos are AI-generated).
  
• Promises of returns up to 300% with minimal risk.
  
• Impressive market charts (NASDAQ, gold, oil) that do not match real market data.
  

The aim is to create instant trust and make potential clients believe they’ve found a reliable partner in the financial markets.

Trading Platform Analysis

Unlike legitimate brokers, Pixocero does not provide access to regulated trading platforms such as MetaTrader 4/5 or cTrader. Instead, it uses a closed, web-based interface entirely controlled by the company. This allows them to:

• Manipulate quotes in real-time.
  
• Simulate trade execution delays to close positions at a loss.
  
• Create “technical issues” when clients try to withdraw funds.
  
• Limit access to analytical tools, making it impossible to compare prices with real market data.
  

Such a setup gives Pixocero full control over trade outcomes, ensuring clients cannot profit in the long term.

What the Investigation Found

A factual check exposes the truth:

• Fake regulation — CySEC license №43211 does not exist.
  
• Offshore registration — domains registered via OffshoreProxy LLC in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction notorious for zero investor protection.
  
• Hidden ownership — WHOIS Privacy conceals all details about the real operators.
  
• Young domains — registered less than a year ago, typical for short-lived scams.
  
• AI-generated “staff photos” with unnatural hands, identical poses, and repeated backgrounds.
  

How the Scam Works

Step 1 – Aggressive acquisition
Pixocero uses targeted ads, fake success stories, social media campaigns, and cold calls to lure new clients.

Step 2 – Fake profits
Once a client opens an account, they see fake profitable trades on manipulated charts. Sometimes, the broker allows a small withdrawal at first to build trust.

Step 3 – Withdrawal block
When the account balance grows, clients face sudden demands: income statements for the last 3–8 years, “tax fees” of up to 90% of the withdrawal amount, or “insurance payments.”

Step 4 – Account drain
The platform manipulates quotes: prices suddenly change before closing positions, stop-loss orders “fail” to trigger, and profitable trades turn into losses. The account balance drops sharply, leaving the client with nothing.

Psychological Manipulation Tactics

Pixocero uses proven psychological pressure techniques to maximize deposits:

• Urgency pressure — “The market is in a perfect entry point right now, you can’t miss this opportunity.”
  
• Initial trust-building — allowing small withdrawals early on to make the client believe the platform is legitimate.
  
• Guilt-shifting — blaming the client for losses: “You didn’t follow our strategy,” “You acted against our advice.”
  
• Loss recovery bait — promising to return all funds if the client makes an additional deposit for “insurance” or “account unlocking.”
  

These tactics are designed to keep victims emotionally invested and financially committed until their funds are fully drained.

Potential International Exposure

While Pixocero is already blacklisted by the Bank of Russia, there is evidence suggesting it operates in multiple regions under different brand names.

• The website’s template, text structure, and technical setup closely match other fraudulent brands.
  
• Ad tracking data shows campaign activity targeting users in Eastern Europe, South America, and parts of Asia.
  
• The short lifespan of the domains (less than a year) suggests Pixocero will likely be rebranded under a new name once complaints escalate.
  

Real Victim Stories

Andrey — lost $14,000
Invested via pixocero.online after a personal call from a “manager.” When attempting a withdrawal, he was asked for over a decade’s worth of income proof, impossible to provide. Account blocked; the “German office” address turned out to be a truck parking lot.

Julia — lost $820
Used the broker’s “auto-trading” feature. Within 20 minutes, 11 losing trades wiped her balance. She was told to pay an additional fee to “restore access” — after paying, communication stopped.

Maxim — lost 85% of his balance
Deposited $10,200. Noticed oil prices on Pixocero dropped by 6% every night — a pattern absent on real markets. Within a week, his balance was nearly gone.

Sergey — blocked after investing $8,700
Promised a 200% profit in a month. Shortly after depositing, asset prices began to collapse abnormally fast. His account was then blocked without explanation.

Legal & Technical Traces

• Domain age: less than 12 months.
  
• Registrar: OffshoreProxy LLC, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.
  
• Ownership: hidden via WHOIS Privacy.
  
• Payment methods: bank cards, USDT, Bitcoin — favored by scammers for irreversible transfers.
  
• Linked scam projects: website design, text, and structure match Bonmopro, Cntly, RossKitWay, and ElazarCapital.
  

Regulatory Warnings

• Bank of Russia has officially blacklisted Pixocero as an entity showing signs of a financial pyramid.
  
• Featured on scam-reporting sites such as moshennik.eu and ScamAdviser.
  
• Absent from all reputable regulatory registers (FCA, ASIC, AMF), despite claiming to be a regulated broker.

Marketing and Client Acquisition Channels

Pixocero runs an aggressive marketing campaign to reach potential victims:

• Social media ads — high-quality banners and short videos promising “passive income” and “guaranteed profits.” These ads often appear on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Telegram.
  
• Fake testimonials — reviews with stock photos or AI-generated images paired with unrealistic profit claims.
  
• Cold calls — unsolicited phone calls from “financial consultants” offering to open an account on the spot.
  
• Fake investment webinars — presentations filled with fabricated charts and statistics, designed to appear professional and trustworthy.
  

This strategy is aimed at quickly building trust and pushing the victim to deposit funds without researching the company.

Red Flags — Why Pixocero Is a Scam

• No real license — fake CySEC number.
  
• Offshore registration with zero investor protection.
  
• Fully controlled, non-transparent web platform instead of MT4/MT5.
  
• Manipulated charts and prices.
  
• Blocked withdrawals and demands for absurd “tax” or “verification” payments.
  
• Fabricated team profiles.
  

What to Do If You’re a Victim

1. Stop all contact with the broker immediately.
   
2. Collect evidence — account screenshots, payment receipts, email/chat logs.
   
3. File a chargeback request with your bank, citing fraudulent activity.
   
4. Report to the police and financial regulators.
   
5. Connect with other victims through forums or social media for collective action.
   

Conclusion on Pixocero 

Pixocero is not a broker — it’s a calculated scam operation dressed in the skin of a legitimate trading platform. Everything from its “license” to its trading data is fabricated.

The only safe approach is to avoid it entirely. If you’ve already invested, act quickly — every day lost reduces the chances of recovering your funds.

Pixocero is a textbook example of how professional-looking websites and fabricated credentials can deceive even cautious investors. Awareness is the strongest defense against such schemes.

Cntly Broker Review

Cntly, previously operating under domains such as cntly.co and m.cntly.co, presents itself as a reliable, internationally regulated broker. However, behind these claims lies a web of offshore registrations, unverifiable licenses, and multiple related platforms — most notably Pocket Option — all of which have attracted the attention of global regulators. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of Cntly’s operations, regulatory status, customer feedback, and the risks associated with investing through this network.

Regulatory Status

Cntly claims to hold a CySEC license (№34578), yet verification shows that no such license exists in the official register of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission. The company is also absent from the registers of other respected regulators, including:

• FCA (UK)
  
• ASIC (Australia)
  
• CySEC (Cyprus)
  
• Central Bank of Russia
  

Instead, Cntly is registered in the offshore jurisdiction of Saint Vincent and the Grenadines — a location known for minimal financial oversight. The related brand Pocket Option operates under PO Trade Ltd, incorporated in Saint Lucia, another offshore zone with little investor protection.

Regulatory Warnings

On 14 September 2021, the Central Bank of Russia officially added cntly.co and multiple domains linked to Pocket Option to its blacklist of entities with signs of illegal financial activity.

The list includes:

• pocketoption.com
  
• po-trade.xyz
  
• pocketoption.page
  
• quotex-ru.com
  
• and many others
  

This extensive network of domains suggests a coordinated effort to attract clients under different names, bypass website blocks, and obscure the company’s track record.

Offshore Jurisdiction Risks in Detail

Operating from offshore jurisdictions like Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Saint Lucia allows companies to avoid the strict oversight and capital requirements imposed by established regulators. While not all offshore brokers are scams, these jurisdictions:

• Do not require audited financial statements.
  
• Offer minimal or no dispute resolution mechanisms for clients.
  
• Provide no investor compensation schemes in the event of insolvency.
  In practice, this means clients have virtually no recourse if their funds are frozen or the broker ceases operations.

Network Strategy and Domain Rotation

Cntly and its associated brands employ a domain rotation strategy to evade detection and bypass government-imposed website blocks. Once a domain accumulates negative reviews or is blocked by regulators, traffic is redirected to a new, nearly identical website. This approach allows the operation to:

• Maintain continuous client acquisition despite bans.
  
• Reset its online reputation with each new domain.
  
• Confuse potential victims who may not realize they are dealing with the same organization.
  

This tactic, combined with aggressive marketing and multilingual websites, enables the network to target traders globally while avoiding accountability.

Linked Projects and Platform Similarities

A side-by-side comparison of Cntly and Pocket Option reveals:

• Identical platform interface — same color scheme, layout, and functionality.
  
• Shared technical infrastructure — identical account dashboards, order execution buttons, and chart tools.
  
• Identical marketing model — promises of high returns, bonus offers, tournaments, and cashback promotions.
  

These similarities indicate that Cntly and Pocket Option are not separate entities, but rather fronts for the same operation.

Trading Conditions and Client Agreement Red Flags

An examination of Cntly’s terms and conditions reveals multiple high-risk clauses for traders:

• Withdrawal commissions between 25%–40% of the requested amount.
  
• Right to freeze accounts without explanation.
  
• Prohibition of class-action lawsuits, preventing collective legal action from clients.
  
• No negative balance protection, meaning traders can lose more than their deposit.
  

Such terms are uncommon among legitimate, regulated brokers and heavily favor the company over the client.

Fraud Pattern

Based on client reports, Cntly and its associated platforms follow a consistent three-stage pattern:

Stage 1 – Client Acquisition
Aggressive marketing with promises of 300–500% annual returns, fake trade screenshots, and persistent cold calls.

Stage 2 – Platform Manipulation
Trades are executed on an internal system, not the real market. Clients report order execution delays of up to 72 hours, ignored stop-losses, and manipulated price quotes that turn winning trades into losses.

Stage 3 – Withdrawal Obstruction
When clients attempt to withdraw funds, they are asked to pay additional “taxes” or “fees” ranging from 15% to 50% of the withdrawal amount. Even after payment, withdrawals are delayed indefinitely, often followed by account suspension.

Real Client Experiences

• Alexey, Moscow: Invested ₽4.5M; account blocked after refusing to pay a ₽300K “commission” to withdraw ₽1M.
  
• Olga, St. Petersburg: “Advisor” lost ₽2.3M in three days; support refused to provide trade reports.
  
• Igor, Kazan: Deposited ₽850K, funds never credited; site went offline a month later.
  
• Elena, Yekaterinburg: Blocked from accessing ₽1.1M; received threatening emails after filing a lawsuit.
  

These accounts reveal consistent patterns of blocked withdrawals, manipulation, and intimidation.

Conclusion on Cntly

Cntly is not an isolated offshore broker but part of a larger network that includes Pocket Option and numerous other domains flagged by regulators. The key risks include:

• Lack of valid licenses
  
• Offshore registration in non-transparent jurisdictions
  
• High withdrawal fees and unfair contractual terms
  
• Regulatory warnings from multiple authorities
  

Given these factors, investing with Cntly or any related platform poses a significant risk of total fund loss. Traders are strongly advised to work only with well-regulated brokers with verified licenses and transparent business practices.